Recruiting math

Nine Finished Michigan Classes Top Out At 68 Percent Blue-Chip, And The 2027 Board Reads 71.4

Fifteen four-stars out of twenty-one commitments is a higher blue-chip share than any of Michigan's last nine finished classes. It is also a rate over a denominator sitting four names below the program's own median class. Across the twenty-six programs that appear on both of this morning's boards, the unfinished figure runs a median of 6.6 points above the finished one.

JS
Jamie SilvaSep 3, 20266 min read
Every call on this site goes on a public ledger and gets graded. The misses stay up.

Michigan is recruiting at a rate it has not touched in a decade. Twenty-one commitments, fifteen of them four-stars, none of them five-stars. That is a blue-chip share of 71.4 percent in the 247Sports Composite, read Thursday morning off a page stamped 1:00 a.m.

No Michigan class has finished a cycle above 68.0 percent since at least 2018.

Both numbers are real and neither is wrong. They also cannot be compared to each other, and the reason has nothing to do with the twenty-one players.

Kyle Whittingham, white-haired and in a navy suit and navy tie, speaking at a lectern carrying the Big Ten Football mark, against a navy backdrop repeating the Big Ten wordmark and a maize block M.
Whittingham at Big Ten media days in Chicago on July 30. Michigan's 2027 board sits 11th nationally this morning and third in the Big Ten, behind Oregon and Ohio State. Photo: Bobak Ha'Eri / CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Half of this rate has not happened yet#

A blue-chip share is five-stars plus four-stars, divided by commitments. Michigan's numerator is fifteen and its denominator is twenty-one.

The numerator only moves when the program signs another four-star. The denominator moves every time it signs anybody. That asymmetry is the whole ballgame, and it runs in one direction all autumn.

Michigan's last nine finished classes carried 20, 26, 25, 22, 23, 25, 26, 25 and 24 names. The median is 25. So the class sitting at twenty-one this morning is short about four commitments, and every one of those four that is not a blue-chip pulls the rate down.

Here is what a finished Michigan class actually looks like, and it is a wide range.

Michigan has finished above 68 percent blue-chip exactly never, and the 2027 bar is not a finished class

Blue-chip share, five-stars plus four-stars divided by total commitments, from the 247Sports Composite team rankings for each class, read September 3, 2026. Bars scaled against a common axis of 80 percent. The bottom bar is a class with twenty-one names in it; the nine above it are complete.

20187 blue-chips of 20
35.0%
201917 of 26
65.4%
202017 of 25
68.0%
202112 of 22
54.5%
202210 of 23
43.5%
202311 of 25
44.0%
202417 of 26
65.4%
202517 of 25
68.0%
202613 of 24
54.2%
2027, unfinished15 of 21, September 3
71.4%

Look at the top bar and the two at 68.0 percent. Michigan's finished classes have ranged from 35.0 percent to 68.0, with a median of 54.5 and a mean of 55.3, which is enormous variance across nine cycles. The 2027 bar sticks out of the top of that range by 3.4 points, and it is the only bar on the chart drawn over a class that can still add people.

Four of those nine classes finished with no five-star at all. At Michigan the blue-chip share is a four-star count wearing a longer name.

Four names decide the rate#

Put the class at twenty-five, which is its own nine-year median, and the arithmetic is short enough to do in your head.

Michigan needs three of its last four commitments to be blue-chips to hold the number it has today

What Michigan's 2027 blue-chip share becomes at a finished class of 25, its median size across the last nine cycles, for each number of additional blue-chips among the last four commitments. Same 80 percent axis as the chart above. The top bar is today.

Today, 21 names15 blue-chips of 21
71.4%
All four blue-chips19 of 25
76.0%
Three of four18 of 25
72.0%
Two of four17 of 25
68.0%
One of four16 of 25
64.0%
None of four15 of 25
60.0%

Two of the four lands on 68.0 percent, which is the program's nine-cycle ceiling to the tenth of a point. One of the four lands on 64.0, which would be fifth of the ten classes here. None of the four lands on 60.0, still above Michigan's own median, and still a drop of 11.4 points from a number nobody would have called a decline.

Nothing in that table requires a single player to decommit or a single evaluation to change. It is the denominator arriving.

How far it usually falls, measured across twenty-six programs#

The published boards do not carry any program's own history of unfinished classes, so the fall cannot be measured against Michigan's own past Septembers. What can be measured is twenty-six programs on one morning.

Twenty-six teams appear in the top forty of both the 2027 Composite team rankings, where every class is unfinished, and the 2026 Composite team rankings, where every class is done. That is the sample, n = 26, and it is a small one. Their unfinished classes average 21.5 names. Their finished ones average 26.6.

Programs on both boards26
Unfinished share above finished share20 of 26
Median gap6.6 points
Mean gap7.7 points
Quartiles of the gap0.1, 6.6, 16.7
Michigan's own gap17.3 points, 6th largest of 26

Twenty of twenty-six point the same way. If the direction were a coin flip, twenty or more out of twenty-six turns up about five times in a thousand. The direction is a real effect. The magnitude is softer, because these are two different recruiting years for each program and a program that simply recruited better this cycle would show the same sign.

Applied to Michigan, a median fall of 6.6 points puts the 2027 class at 64.8 percent and a mean fall of 7.7 puts it at 63.7. Both land between the 2026 class at 54.2 and the 2019 and 2024 classes at 65.4. That is fifth of the ten classes on the chart. It is not the best one, and 71.4 percent is not a number Michigan has ever carried to signing day.

The numerator moves too, depending on which board you count#

One more thing sits underneath all of this, and it is the same company on both sides.

247Sports publishes two boards. On its own, where it states that a four-star is a rating of 90 or better, Michigan's 2027 class is 18th nationally with nine blue-chips of twenty-one. On its Composite it is 11th with fifteen of twenty-one. Same morning, same twenty-one teenagers, and six of them are four-stars on one page and three-stars on the other.

So the blue-chip share of this class is either 71.4 percent or 42.9 percent, and the only way to say which is to say which board you counted on. Everything above is the Composite, every cycle, on purpose. A rate is not comparable to a rate built on a different rule, and that applies across boards exactly the way it applies across dates.

What this does not show#

It does not show that Michigan's 2027 class is good or bad. A star rating is a company's published opinion about a high school player, not a measurement, and a share of them is an opinion divided by an opinion.

It does not measure decommitments. A board loses names as well as gaining them, and none of the figures here counts a single departure. That channel pushes the same rate around and it is not in any of this.

It does not account for a staff change. Kyle Whittingham is in his first season at Michigan, and whether a new staff fills a board on the ordinary schedule is not something nine earlier Michigan cycles can answer.

And in three of the nine finished classes, 2018, 2020 and 2022, the star counts do not sum to the commitment total, so one name in each is unrated and sits in the denominator without a star. The shares above use total commitments throughout, which is the harder version of the number for Michigan.

Called Shots#

Two, both scored by opening one page in February.

One: Michigan's 2027 class finishes with a blue-chip share below 68.0 percent in the 247Sports Composite. Blue-chips divided by total commitments on its team-rankings row, read after the class closes. At the median fall it lands near 64.8. To beat 68.0 it has to add at least two more blue-chips in its last four names, which is the single thing this call could get wrong. Priced at -185.

Two: Michigan finishes the 2027 cycle with at least 24 total commitments in the Composite. Six of its last nine classes cleared 24 and three did not, so this is the denominator half of the argument put on the record separately. If Michigan stops at 22, the fall is much smaller and the first call gets much harder. Priced at -160.

Revisit both on February 15, 2027.

Method

Every figure comes from the 247Sports Composite team-ranking pages, one per class, read Thursday, September 3, 2026. The 2027 page carried a stamp of 09/03/26 at 1:00 a.m. CST, the 2026 page 09/02/26 at 1:15 p.m., the 2025 page 09/01/26 at 1:45 p.m. Michigan's rows: 2018, 20 commits and 0 five-stars and 7 four-stars; 2019, 26/2/15; 2020, 25/0/17; 2021, 22/1/11; 2022, 23/1/9; 2023, 25/0/11; 2024, 26/0/17; 2025, 25/2/15; 2026, 24/2/11; 2027 as it stands, 21/0/15. The 247Sports-only board for 2027, a separate page from the same company, states 21 commits, 0 five-stars, 9 four-stars, 12 three-stars, 18th nationally.

Blue-chip share is defined here as five-stars plus four-stars over total commitments, including any commitment carrying no star rating. The cross-program measurement uses the 26 teams appearing in the top forty of both the 2027 and 2026 Composite team rankings, with each team's unfinished 2027 share compared to its own finished 2026 share. The direction test is a sign test on those 26 paired differences: 20 positive, one-sided p equal to 0.005.

Confidence is high on every stated figure and on the arithmetic, which is division. It is high on the direction of the fall and lower on its size, because the 26 pairs compare two different recruiting cycles for each program rather than one program against its own past. The projection of 63.7 to 64.8 percent is an estimate built on that median and mean, not a model, and it assumes a finished class near twenty-five names.

Class ranks and star ratings are published opinions from a recruiting service and are cited as such throughout. Nothing here evaluates a player.

Filed under Michigan FB

Latest on the Michigan FB

The whole beat →
Michigan's last three opponents are 21-6, and each is playing for the playoff
The wider view

Michigan's last three opponents are 21-6, and each is playing for the playoff

The College Football Playoff selection committee's second ranking, released November 10, has UCLA 4th, Oregon 16th and Ohio State 20th, Michigan's last three opponents, who are a combined 21-6. Michigan, 5-4 and unranked, needs one win for bowl eligibility. By DraftKings' moneylines with the margin removed, it has about a 22% chance at Oregon and 18% at Ohio State.

Wes FerryNov 11, 20265 min read
Twelve throws on third-and-short, three sacks: what Jim Harding inherits
Deep dive

Twelve throws on third-and-short, three sacks: what Jim Harding inherits

By CollegeFootballData's play-by-play across Michigan's nine 2026 games, Michigan converted 17 of 27 third downs with 3 yards or fewer to go when it ran and 5 of 12 when it threw, with three sacks on those throws, all against Indiana. Tommy Carr has been sacked on about 1 dropback in 9, against 1 in 19 for Bryce Underwood, and its first- and second-down runs have lost ground more often. Jim Harding, the offensive line coach, is now interim coordinator and will lead a collaborative play-calling group at Oregon, which has at least two sacks in each of its last six games.

Wes FerryNov 9, 20266 min read
Michigan held Michigan State without a touchdown and lost by nine
Takeaways

Michigan held Michigan State without a touchdown and lost by nine

Michigan State beat Michigan 15-6 at Michigan Stadium on November 7 on five Liam Boyd field goals. Twelve of the 15 points came on drives that started at the Michigan State 38 or better, set up by two Michigan punts from deep after sacks and by two turnovers. Michigan gained 192 yards, was sacked five times, went 2 of 10 on third down and did not score until 1:35 remained.

Wes FerryNov 8, 20266 min read

Earlier on the Michigan FB

Michigan State's top three backs are out, and its quarterback is questionable
Game day

Michigan State's top three backs are out, and its quarterback is questionable

Michigan (5-3) hosts Michigan State (2-6) at 7:30 p.m. Eastern on Peacock as a 14-point favorite. The Big Ten's Friday report lists Michigan State's three leading running backs Out and quarterback Alessio Milivojevic Questionable; Michigan, which has won one game by more than seven points, gets defensive ends John Henry Daley and Dom Nichols back as Probable.

Wes FerryNov 7, 20265 min read
Michigan and Penn State were ranked in August but got no votes Sunday
The wider view

Michigan and Penn State were ranked in August but got no votes Sunday

Michigan received no votes in either poll on Sunday, October 4, after losing 20-14 at Minnesota. A week earlier it had 54 AP points and was 24th in the coaches poll. Penn State, which lost 34-13 at Northwestern, also received none. They were 16th and 18th in the preseason AP poll and meet at Michigan Stadium on October 17 at 3:30 p.m. Eastern. Washington, preseason 17th, is the third of the eight Big Ten teams in that preseason poll to sit at 0-2 with no votes. Minnesota and Northwestern, who beat Michigan and Penn State, both received votes. Six Big Ten teams are 2-0 in the conference and seven are 0-2. In the last two Big Ten seasons every title-game team was 8-1 or better, and Michigan can finish no better than 7-2. Its at-large path is 10-2, which means winning all seven remaining games. In 2024 and 2025, 75 FBS teams lost two of their first five games. One, Notre Dame in 2025, won the rest; it finished 11th in the committee's final ranking and was not in the field. None of the 41 power-conference teams among them won out; two finished 9-3. Michigan scores 23.0 points a game, 106th of 138 FBS teams, and four of its last seven opponents are in the top 14. Tight end Zack Marshall apologized on Tuesday for leaked messages criticizing offensive coordinator Jason Beck. Andrew Sprague has missed three straight games.

Wes FerryOct 7, 20266 min read
Michigan Would Not Name Its Two Starting Guards Because Three Seniors Are Going To Split The Job
Game week

Michigan Would Not Name Its Two Starting Guards Because Three Seniors Are Going To Split The Job

Michigan's offensive coordinator held his final press conference before the opener on Wednesday afternoon and was asked the question that has followed this offensive line since camp opened. Jason Beck answered it with a number rather than a name. Evan Link, Nathan Efobi and Brady Norton will all play at the two guard spots, at what Beck called fairly similar snaps, and Clayton Sayfie of On3 reported that the rotation may hold for more than one game. The three tackles-and-center jobs are settled: Blake Frazier on the left, Jake Guarnera at center, Andrew Sprague on the right, the last of those hardened by Andrew Babalola's injury. Michigan's own roster still lists nineteen men as OL and nothing else, while it breaks the defensive line into ends and tackles, and on Wednesday the defensive coordinator named starters at both.

Grant LombardSep 3, 20265 min read